Skip Navigation
We use cookies to offer you a better browsing experience, provide ads, analyze site traffic, and personalize content. If you continue to use this site, you consent to our use of cookies.
Legislative Memo

Memo: NSEA Supports Senate Bill 224

SB224 clarifies that in a large school district (i.e. CCSD), contract language that establishes procedures for the transfer or reassignment of employees in a surplus or reduction-in-force situation takes precedence over language in NRS 388G.610 (AB469- CCSD reorganization).
SupportSB224
Published: 03/24/2021

In 2017, Assembly Bill 469 reorganized the Clark County School District (CCSD), transferring much decision-making authority to individual school precincts. The language stated each local school precinct shall have the authority to select staff who work under the direct supervision of the principal. For the past several years, this language has caused a lot of confusion for both the district and education support professionals with conflicting language on transfers and reassignments in existing contract language. NSEA and ESEA have maintained it was never the intent of AB469 to override contract language on this issue. Unfortunately, in 2017, an opinion issued by Attorney General Laxalt disagreed.

Previously, the surplus process in CCSD allowed the district to balance staffing with decreasing student enrollment. ESPs with the lowest seniority in their position went through the surplus process when schools could no longer afford their position. This process had nothing to do with job performance. While the surplus process was stressful for the employee, nearly everyone was placed in a new position at the end of the day. Last fall, relying on the 2017 opinion, CCSD began requiring ESPs to interview with a school principal as a part of the surplus process. Over 50 ESPs went through this new process, and several ESPs were rejected for a lateral position through no fault of their own because of a principal’s discretion. Serious questions of racial bias have been raised in this process.

This issue was heard before the Employee- Management Relations Board (EMRB), and on December 7, 2020, they issued a decision rejecting the 2017 Attorney General Opinion as well as various arguments regarding the authority held by principals in a surplus or reduction in force situation. While that decision was appreciated, the issue is not settled. SB224 is the legislative fix we need to settle it.

Senate Bill 224 will provide and ensure clarity and fairness in the employee surplus process. With SB224, the consistent application of the surplus process across the district will help resolve any employee confusion with district work practices. Employees should not be denied an available position due to a displacement that was no fault of their own. We urge the passage of SB224.

What's On Your Mind?

We’re here to help. Our community comes to us seeking tools (guides, reports, trainings, and more) to help answer everyday questions. We’re here to support you in whatever you need.

Become a Grassroots Task Force Ambassador!

Support NSEA Strategic Goals in Membership and Politics by increasing active participants, as measured by participation in letter-writing campaigns, social media promotion, rally attendance, and collective action participation.
Logo

Ensuring a High Quality Public Education For Every Student

NSEA has been the voice of educators for over 120 years. We represent teachers, education support professionals, and other licensed professionals throughout the state of Nevada.